The Browns have a variety of options with the top pick in the draft. Will they select a player based on talent or need, or will they trade the pick? The Cleveland Browns are three weeks away from the most important decision of their entire rebuild under Hue Jackson and Sashi Brown. The one saving grace of their frustrating season is that they got the first overall pick in the draft. While Cleveland would love options have that selection in a draft with a clear franchise quarterback available, this draft doesn't have that. Editor's Picks Cleveland's QB solution might already be on the roster The Browns need QB help in the worst way, right? The Trade have four of the first 52 picks in the draft, thanks to some clever trades. Here are the teams that have done the best and worst jobs of adding to their draft assets. Jimmy Johnson, Jerry Jones and the Cowboys made a point of stockpiling draft picks in the early '90s. Bill Barnwell examines the draft classes with the trade capital and how they turned out. That isn't to say the Browns won't have exciting options. Regardless of what they do with the choice, Cleveland should be able to add a significant asset or two with the first pick. The organizational braintrust has already spent months laboring over its options, but it's worth putting those options into perspective. If you're looking for an answer on what the Browns should do with the top choice in the draft, the best response is: The default choice for the Browns seems to be holding onto their selection and picking the class' consensus No. Virtually every mock draft has the Browns nabbing Garrett, and even the most skeptical observers couldn't fault them for doing so. No prospect is a lock, but Garrett profiles as a superstar edge rusher. No decision in football offers any higher upside than the possibility of finding a franchise quarterback on a cost-controlled rookie contract. It's an enormous competitive advantage versus most of the other top teams in football, who options star quarterbacks but have to pay them a salary commensurate with their performance history. Even picks at or near the top of the draft offer an enormous savings: Each has a team option that will still come in far below the quarterbacks' true market value if they develop into even average starters. What does all of this have to do with Garrett? Well, the league doesn't quite regard dominant pass-rushers to be as valuable as transcendent quarterbacks, but it's close. Let's work with the contract Chandler Jones just signed to stay in Arizona. That's not quite the savings you would get on a star quarterback, and there aren't any guarantees Garrett will turn into a star edge rusher, but it's enough upside to justify drafting Garrett with the first overall pick. On the other trade, the math might be so heavily in favor of drafting a quarterback that the Browns could have a credible case for picking one, such as Deshaun Watson or Mitch Trubiskywith the first overall pick. They could try to wait and draft one of those guys with the 12th pick, but given how teams fall in love with quarterbacks, if the Browns see a passer they really want, it probably behooves them to go after a passer with the first pick. The Browns aren't most organizations, though, and their most similar comparable from the past also ignored that rule. The last team to amass this sort of draft capital over a multiyear stretch is the Jimmy Johnson-era Cowboyswho used the Herschel Walker trade as the centerpiece trade their strategy to go after as many picks as possible. InJohnson took over a team and used the first overall pick in the draft on UCLA quarterback Troy Aikman, passing on running back Barry Sanders and linebacker Derrick Thomas in the process. Three months later, Johnson used the first pick in the supplemental trade on Steve Walsh, his quarterback at Miami. In doing so, Johnson knew he was sacrificing Dallas' first-round nfl in the draft as part of the equation; that pick would have been the first overall selection and given the Cowboys the opportunity to take Jeff George or perhaps Junior Trade. It worked out all right for the Cowboys in the long run. Aikman struggled as a rookie before eventually emerging as a star; Walsh was narrowly better in five starts that year, but Johnson traded him to the Saints during the season for first- second- and third-round picks in future drafts. The Cowboys had so much in the way of draft capital that they could afford to use high first-round picks on two quarterbacks and hand over the job to the better of the two. I don't think it would make sense for the Browns to draft two quarterbacks, but they have the capital and the cap space to use a first-round pick on one in each of the next two seasons. Let's say they draft Watson with the first overall pick and decide after one frustrating year that he isn't the guy. Cleveland will have a high first-round pick in to go with three second-rounders and two fourth-round picks. It will have plenty of assets to go after another quarterback to either push Watson or take over, and there probably would be a trade market for Watson even after a disappointing campaign. Often missing in this discussion when it plays out nationally is the opportunity cost of drafting a quarterback at No. If the Browns take a shot on Watson with the first pick, they miss out on their shot at drafting Garrett, who is projected to be hugely valuable in his own right. Using an additional first-round pick on a quarterback would cost the Browns another player who is likely to be useful. At the same time, though, it's impossible to ignore the reality of needing a quarterback to win in the NFL. You can get by without one if you have a dominant defense and a great running game, but Cleveland's D is still years away. The Browns also could come out ahead in terms of value even if they have to draft two QBs. Let's say the Browns use the first overall pick in on a quarterback and then do the same thing again in If one of the two turns out to be an above-average starter, the Browns would still be saving money versus the cost of acquiring a player of similar caliber in free agency, and they would be getting a younger talent in the process. If drafting quarterbacks is a crapshoot, getting two chances to throw the dice might be the best way to solve Cleveland's options problem. History would tell us the best move is to trade the No. Research suggests that teams aren't capable of beating the draftand teams who trade out of the top five and acquire additional picks often end up getting the better end of the bargain. If there were a quarterback trade was widely regarded as a future superstar, a la Andrew Luck, at the top of the class, the Browns probably would nfl smart to hold onto the pick, but that isn't the case here in The Browns probably would be passing on nfl looks to be an excellent pass-rush prospect options Garrett if they traded down, but we often fool ourselves into thinking that we have a better read on the available rookies in a given class before the draft. I included a chart in previewing Cleveland's offseason that noted how former unquestioned, no-doubt first overall picks such as Jadeveon Clowney and Courtney Brown weren't even the best pass-rushers from their nfl draft classes. In options player pool expected to be deep with pass-rushing talent, the Browns might very well be better off trading down and grabbing a couple of edge defenders before sorting through them at the professional level alongside picks Emmanuel Ogbah and Carl Nassib. There are two reasonable arguments against trading down. One is that the Browns have simply amassed so many picks that they might be better off focusing on premium talent as opposed to depth. Coaches can evaluate only so many young players, and there are only so many reps and roster spots to go around. The idea that the Browns will turn a first-round pick into trade dozen trade and end up trading a dollar for 10 nickels is some sort nfl anti-analytics strawman, but there is a balance to be struck between simply acquiring as many picks as possible and coming away with the right picks. The other is a matter of public relations. The Browns are not tanking quite as obviously as teams such as the Astros and 76ers have in their respective sports, and any argument that their braintrust needs to be let go or changed after one year is absurd. But it's also realistic to think fans will get restless if Cleveland continues to trade down nfl after year and continually pushes for better assets in the future. It's too early to judge whether the Browns were right to trade away the second overall pick as part of last year's Carson Wentz nfl with the Eagles, but trading away another top-two pick for something short of a major haul might be too opportunistic. The Browns will have plenty of opportunities to continue to make smart moves. They will be able to push their advantage and leverage their pick haul. There's also a question of degree. If the Browns can pick up only a relatively small upgrade in terms of draft capital for the first pick, they're probably better off just drafting Garrett and using it as cover fire when they do inevitably make other trades later on during the draft process. As is the case with any options or team operating unconventionally in a very traditional landscape, the Browns have to pick their battles. Unless they get blown away with an offer, the first overall pick might not be the right place to push the envelope. The most aggressive choice the Browns could make, of course, would be to swap the first overall pick as part of a trade for New England's backup quarterback. Garoppolo was excellent in a small sample to start the season, although he separated his shoulder during his second start and has just 94 pass attempts to his professional name. I nfl about Garoppolo at length in Septemberand the four passes he threw after returning from his injury shouldn't impact that analysis. It's easier to argue against trading for Garoppolo than it is to argue for it. I mentioned earlier how the Browns would be able options create significant surplus value with a successful first overall pick options of whether they drafted Garrett or a quarterback. That's not without merit -- you would rather have a good quarterback making market value than no quarterback at all -- but one of the reasons draft picks are valuable is the opportunity to get talented contributors for a fraction of their true price, allowing you to spend those resources elsewhere. The other side of that coin is that the floor of a player making options money is far worse than it is for a draft pick. It's a lot of money to burn. The argument in favor of trading for Garoppolo revolves around certainty -- the Browns know more about his professional viability than they do about the players in this draft class or the ones likely to be available in It's hard to say they know significantly more. ESPN's Brian Burke used a Bayesian approach to find that Garoppolo's 94 career attempts aren't incredibly meaningful. Burke's research suggests that there's a 64 percent chance Garoppolo is better than a generic first-round pick at quarterback, which is just enough to make Garoppolo tantalizing without representing surefire usefulness. There's also the issue of injury; staying healthy is a skill, and while injuries can obviously happen at random, nfl quarterbacks are capable of avoiding most hits and keeping themselves as healthy as possible. Garoppolo suffered his shoulder injury when he scrambled to keep a play alive on third-and-long with a point lead. His sprained AC joint could be a case of bad luck or a sign that Garoppolo will struggle to keep himself on the field. The value proposition for Garoppolo with the first overall pick let alone the reported additional picks the Patriots are demanding in a Garoppolo trade just isn't really there. It's hard to find a similar trade in the recent past where a team gave up a significant pick for a player with such little experience. I mentioned Steve Walsh in my column earlier this weekand the Saints did trade first- second- and third-round picks for a player with pass attempts to his name, but those picks were mid-round selections. The closest deal I can find is when Buffalo traded the ninth and st picks to the Jaguars in for Rob Johnson, who had thrown 35 career passes in three years after being selected in the fourth round of the draft by Jacksonville. Johnson immediately signed a five-year deal with the Bills, only to repeatedly struggle with injuries while racking up an absurd sack rate of The Jags used the ninth pick on Fred Taylor, who became a franchise icon in Florida. There's no right answer. Each of the Browns' options carries meaningful risk and the possibility of significant reward. The safest choice would be to listen to the nfl and draft Garrett, but it's not particularly safe. The most aggressive decision would be to trade for Garoppolo, but his contract to come also would ensure the pick had a relatively low ceiling. Fatalistic Browns fans or onlookers might assume the Browns will just make the incorrect choice, but that's lazy and overly simplistic. Whatever Cleveland does with the first overall pick is the first step in a broader process. Watson might be a star in a vacuum, but the Browns will need to develop an infrastructure for success around whichever quarterback they end up with. Garrett might be a force of nature under Trade Phillips or Bill Belichick, but Gregg Williams would need to put Garrett in places where he could options. Anybody who is certain about what the Browns need to do with the No. We use cookies to offer an improved online experience. By clicking "OK" without changing your settings you are giving your consent to receive cookies. Golf Tennis NCAAM MMA WWE Boxing esports Chalk Analytics NCAAW WNBA NASCAR Jayski Racing Horse RN FB RN BB NCAA LLWS Olympic Sports Special Olympics X Games Cricket Rugby Endurance CFL. NFL NFL Home Home Fantasy: Browns' dilemma with No. Darren Waller's suspension marks Ravens' NFL-leading 13th since 10h Jamison Hensley. Fantasy football mock draft: Opinions on Cousins are divided, but the numbers say pay him 2d Seth Walder. The NFL's best pass-rusher is Inside Russell Wilson's nine-meal, 4,calorie diet to cut weight 2d Sheil Kapadia. Richard Seymour's poker career offers a new kind of rush 17h Bernard Lee. How Ben Roethlisberger bridged a seven-year divide with his hometown 2d Jeremy Fowler. Final all-time rankings for every team 3d ESPN. The Browns are on the clock 0: Close Bill Barnwell is a staff writer for ESPN. ABOUT COOKIES We use cookies to offer an improved online experience.
For to assume that the Sovereign Power can never err, or never be ignorant of anything, would amount to regarding that Power as favoured with heavenly inspiration and as exalted above the reach of mankind, which is absurd.
I obtained my MSc (2006) in Computational Design from the MIT Department of Architecture, and BASc (2004) in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto.
For to assume that the Sovereign Power can never err, or never be ignorant of anything, would amount to regarding that Power as favoured with heavenly inspiration and as exalted above the reach of mankind, which is absurd.
I obtained my MSc (2006) in Computational Design from the MIT Department of Architecture, and BASc (2004) in Engineering Science from the University of Toronto.
Her first starring role was in the comedy film Biglang Yaman (Sudden.
Contact our central office registration team at (919) 684-6259 or via email.